15 Reasons Why Batman v Superman Was Terrible

Batman v Superman certainly looked like it was going to be a good movie. The casting of Ben Affleck made it seem like this would be the best on-screen Batman yet. The trailers made it look like it was going to be a truly memorable comic book film. However, the movie turned out to be a disaster. Critics have almost universally given the movie terrible reviews. At 29% on Rotten Tomatoes it has one of the lowest scores of any comic book movie. The top critic score is even lower at a measly 26%.

The reaction that people had to the movie puts the future of the DC Extended Universe in question, and there could definitely be some changes made when it comes to future DC Comics films. The box office will be the true test of what the future holds for this film series, and so far it is getting by with a $170 million domestic opening weekend. However, just imagine what kind of numbers it could have pulled in if the movie was actually good. This article obviously contains spoilers, so if you haven't seen the movie don't go any further.

15 Dream sequences


There are multiple dream sequences in Batman v Superman, and none of them are necessary. They serve no purpose other than to tell people about a Justice League movie. If you aren’t a comic book fan you will be confused. Batman is distraught about the murder of his parents as he always is, but a bat monster coming out of his father’s coffin is completely pointless. It’s only there to have some creepy special effects.

14 More destruction


Apparently Zack Snyder didn’t learn anything after the complaints about Man of Steel. The movie started out promising showing Bruce Wayne running into the rubble of the Wayne financial building. It showed the repercussions of the widespread chaos that happened in Metropolis during Man of Steel. However, that’s where it ends.

13 Lois Lane


Just as in Man of Steel, Lois Lane is only in the movie when the writers have written themselves into the corner and need some device to keep the story going. She is not a fleshed out or well-rounded character. Instead, Lois Lane is a device to show exposition.

12 Shoehorning in other DC characters


Marvel Studios has received plenty of criticism for having some films be too much of a stepping stone to set up future films rather than, first and foremost, focusing on a good standalone story. For the most part Marvel gets it right. For every Iron Man 2 there is a Captain America: Winter Soldier. Sometimes Marvel does it perfectly and makes a movie like Ant-Man, which works as a stand alone movie yet manages to set up future movies without having things feel forced.

11 Having Batman join Superman is forced

Martha. That’s all it takes for Batman to decide that he doesn’t want to kill Superman after all. He shouldn’t really have wanted to killed Superman in the first place, but the fact that Clark’s mother has the same name as Bruce’s mother is grasping at straws.

10 Lex Luthor Jr. is annoying


Jesse Eisenberg makes Jim Carrey’s Riddler and Jamie Foxx’s Electro look like Oscar-worthy performances. His portrayal of Lex Luthor - actually it’s Lex Luthor Jr. - is so over the top it takes campy to a new level. He has weird ticks, rambles incessantly about gods and is so unconvincing that his ability to be manipulative is never believable.

9 Character motivations make no sense

via youtube

Lex Luthor’s reasons for making Batman and Superman fight are non-existent in the film. It is never explained why he hates Superman and why he wants Superman to kill Batman. He goes out of his way to frame Superman multiple times even though it is completely unnecessary because the public already mostly hates Superman.

8 It is very poorly edited

via youtube

Scenes in this movie do not flow together well. The jumps from one scene to the next are jarring. To say this movie is random would be an understatement. It is less of a movie and more of just a collection for scenes.

7 Even the score is grating


Gone is the menacing, orchestral score of the Dark Knight, and instead it is replaced by a synthesized rock mix that couldn’t be further from the classic sounds of the best films. It’s loud, brash and lacks any subtlety or nuance.

6 Cringe-worthy dialogue


Did someone actually think lines like: “don’t give me a bucket of piss and call it granny’s peach tea” was good writing? The things some of the characters say in Batman v Superman are completely mind-boggling. Lex Luthor rambles on incoherently about gods and other such nonsense for what seems like an eternity.

5 It makes a mockery of the greatest DC comics


One of the greatest Batman comic books is The Dark Knight Returns and one of the greatest Superman comics is The Death of Superman. Both these groundbreaking tales are used as influence for Batman v Superman. The influence is mostly visual however. The key messages of these stellar comic books are completely ignored.

4 It’s almost entirely humorless


There are a few jokes in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, but they are few and far between. The ones that are there are not funny at all. It’s not as if a movie about Batman fighting Superman has to be filled with corny one liners and constant jokes like some of the Marvel movies.

3 Batman is a murderer

Every director who makes a Batman movie decides to have Batman kill people. Why is this? The most vital character trait of Batman is that he is about justice, not vengeance. He hates guns and he doesn’t kill. Burton went down a slippery path with Batman on film. Nolan took a step back, but still had Batman kill people – either by not saving them or through collateral damage. Zack Snyder’s Batman leaves a path of destruction so uncompromising that he seems less like Batman and more like The Punisher. In Frank Miller’s The Dark Knight Returns Batman famously says that "guns are the weapon of the enemy," and he snaps a gun in half with his hands. In Batman v Superman, Batman happily points a criminal’s gun at a hostage taker and blows him to smithereens.

2 It’s incredibly boring

Even for a Zack Snyder film, Batman v Superman has very little action, and the action that is there is mostly a mess. The CGI looks extremely dated. It’s a video game on steroids and nothing more. After Jurassic World and Star Wars: The Force Awakens, which just came out last year, we are now accustomed to a certain level of special effects. There have been numerous blockbusters that have seamlessly blended CGI with real world environments and made us think that what we see on screen is actually happening. This is not one of those films.

1 Marvel did it much better

via youtube

Superheroes fighting, superheroes joining up to fight a bigger foe, senate hearings, political mystery and intrigue - all these things are in Batman v Superman, and they are also in a number of Marvel movies including The Winter Soldier, The Avengers and Iron Man 2. Therein lies one of the greatest problems in Batman v Superman.

The Marvel movies had these elements spread out over multiple movies while Batman v Superman tries to put it all in one movie. Whether you’re a DC fanboy or a Marvelite is irrelevant. Marvel did everything we saw in Batman v Superman much more competently. Watching the late great Gary Shandling as Senator Sterns in Iron Man 2 was infinitely more enjoyable that watching Holly Hunter stare at a jar of urine. Hulkbuster vs Hulk was much more entertaining than watching Batman fight Superman in a dingy building, and unraveling the mystery of Hydra was so much more fun to watch than seeing Lois Lane haphazardly stumble towards revealing Lex Luthor was behind the Superman framings.


Give TheRichest a Thumbs up!

Looking for an AD FREE EXPERIENCE on TheRichest?

Get Your Free Access Now!

More in Entertainment

15 Reasons Why Batman v Superman Was Terrible